About The Death of Numbers


The Death of Numbers is the bestselling book by renowned author and new age theorist, John Henry Morel. 

The Death of Numbers is more about where numbers came from rather than where they are going. 

This book should have been nominated for a Nobel Prize in mathematics or at least a nomination for literature or poetry. 

If math was ever poetic, it was poetry in The Death of Numbers by John Henry Morel. It seems that the author has a penchant for the absolute nature of language in addition to his penchant for the absolute nature of math and physics. It could have very well been titled, "The Death of Language" or "The Downfall of Literature." He could have dispensed with the math altogether and completely rewritten the science of language. He plays with language like a preschooler plays with crayons: Easily and with great dexterity. The beauty of the result is a fixed notion of where we are going in scientific endeavor! Where we are going is, for the most part, the highest level of development ever to be achieved by a developed civilization. In addition to discussing the current state of mathematics and the use of numbers in commerce today, he ramifies the equation by including detailed analysis of what happened along the way from the earliest civilizations onward. He doesn't skip a beat between the first and greatest cultures to walk this planet and neither does he tell all in the face of his task and numbered suites of poetic endeavor in this book. Chapter by chapter he more finely essays the strengths and weaknesses of a society built upon a systematic and symbolic regimen of alphabetaic symbols and numeric junk, while simultaneously discovering for us the essence of the problem underneath all the layers of heightened release and sophomoric tendencies in modern society. He doesn't beat around the bush any more than a page or two and then begins to define for us exactly what is missing and what "should" be missing from the equation. 

The science of numbers is this, according to the author: That math can once again be what it was in the beginning; a whole and completely integrous system of symbolic language without flaws and crippling devices put there by prior inhabitants to disrupt and completely interfere with social and moral and economic success on the level of sublime unity and conscious discovery and invention. The acceleration of civilization and the eventual arrival at its zenith or zennit of of excellence can only be achieved by removing what was basically placed as a hurdle by those that came before us. Adapting older systems of representation and communication through language does not mean stepping back or faltering for a moment. It means accelerating to the point at which one may discover what was already there and no longer giving allegiance to a language that was altered in the process of its development to "interfere" with success and social development in order to control those that used that language. References to the Fall of Babylon ring true here, but the history of such impedances goes much further back, before the early Macedonians and certainly before the Egyptians starting using ropes to measure and build the pyramids. 

Like it or not, The Death of Numbers accounts for a great number of influences over the ages, but in no way does it solve the problem that man has yet to surmount: The Death of Numbers is chiefly an interim solution to assist us in understanding what the real problem is, not what the real solution is. It is left to the reader to deduce what the possible solutions are in the wake of the discovery that the mathematics we were given was given to us to prevent us from becoming the best that we could be, in order to halt us in any semblance of progress as a civilization. 

In the past, reading and writing were the exclusive domain of the wealthy and those in power. Books were locked away and kept from the peasant folk in order to prevent them from too much knowledge and too much power over the class of individuals that happened to be in power at the time. It is a shame that the Libraries of Ptolemy at Alexander were destroyed. You never know what might have been discovered in those scrolls and written on the parchments and goatskins that were left for us to discover later on in our development. 

Editor, Rodaian Press

Paperback, 9.61" x 6.69", 136 pages. First Edition. 


Get The Bestselling Book!

Basic Principles

  • The first law of numbers is not to use them, ever!

    John Henry Morel
    The Death of Numbers

  • The second law of numbers is that numbers are not real. When dealing with money and important affairs of economy and wealth, use real numbers, not falacies!

    John Henry Morel
    The Death of Numbers

  • Real numbers are not like 1, 2, 3. They are more like A, B, C or I, II, III. Even better would be i, ii, iii.

    John Henry Morel
    The Death of Numbers

  • You do the math: Every Cow Has His Day or ECHHD! Or XXIV! Or Lucky Cows Drink Milk: LCDM, or EVERY COW HAS HIS DAY: ECHHD! Every math has its day!

    John Henry Morel
    The Death of Numbers

  • The other law of numbers goes like this: Numbers do away with numbers in my way! Numbers do away with numbers in my way! Numbers do away with numbers in my way!

    John Henry Morel
    The Death of Numbers

Additional Thoughts

    How does one person rule a universe? There are two options here. The first option is to distort space until you achieve the opposite result. The second option is already taken. The Simpsons did it first.
    -
    The sum of all things great and small is this: Naught equals the sum of all things.
    -
    If nothing is less than something, what is nothing?
    -
    In the development of science, two questions must be answered before achieving answers. The first question has already been answered: Ø = What? The second question is, "What?" These two salient questions can resolve all scientific disputes and inadequacies in formulations and equations. The most robust form of equative mathematics involves only one integer and that is not a number but a letter: Ø. Aught equals naught and was the original symbol in the alphabet before the early Rodaian civilizations existed. Ø signifies in the original alphabet/symbology, the lack of existence or the presence of the lack of existence. Since at one point or another all things cease to exist and then exist and then cease to exist momentarily, this quality or "state" must be accounted for if we are to find the ultimate solution to a scientific inquiry into the Universe.
    -
    Naught = What? Ø = What?
    -
    Naught.

States of Being

    The original formation or formulation for the universe is that no living being remains in existence any longer than it remains out of existence. In other words, states of matter are like states of grace: There is only one state that one can be in at any given time. If you are not in a state of grace, you are in a state of becoming a state of grace. That is the law of existence and the law of non-existence. That is the key inquiry man must make in order to understand the Universe that he lives within in various states of grace and nonexistence and existence. Such is matter that man can suspend his quality of existence for another in order to maintain his existence over an extended period of time. Such is the state of grace in this Universe.

Positive Theory

    Positive Theory suggests two things simultaneously: One thing that it suggests is that man is in a perpetual state of existing grace; the other thing that it suggests is that man is in a perpetual state of non-existent grace. Either way, man is in a state of grace, whether he realizes it or not. To be in a state of grace is like being in a motor car: You are constantly turning corners to go the other way around. If one is constantly turning corners to return to where he came from, then obviously man is in a perpetual state of grace, since at no time is man not turning corners. To turn corners means to reverse the fact that you at one time existed, and then begin to exist again. To exist again means to come into existence and to cease to exist again. If to exist again means to exist again and not exist again, then man is obviously existing in more than one way at one time and he cannot cease to exist nor cease to not exist. That is the question.

    To heal the language of man, one must account for this state of non-existent and existent grace. Man cannot heal the state that he is in until he discovers that he exists and not exists at the same time. In other words, man is existing to not exist at all times while existing to exist at all times. These two facts establish a need for an existent/non-existent mathematics that is equal to the task of communicating naughts and thoughts. To think is to achieve unless you have been deceived. To be deceived by a race of beings once thought superior to you, is to be deceived into thinking that you only exist for them. To be relieved of a race of beings who once thought you inferior to them, is to be relieved into thinking that you only exist for you again. That is the speaking. That is the reason.

    To be excused for not thinking, is to be excused for thinking that you are naught.

    To be excused for thinking that you are naught, is not to be excused.

    To be excused is to not be excused. That is the solution.

    Excuse me for thinking.

    Excuse me for leaving.

    Amen!! Amen!! Amen!!

Real Life Tryouts

  • The first lesson of mechanics of opposites: Nothing is less than one!

    John Henry Morel
    The Death of Numbers

  • The second lesson of mechanics of opposites: There is no such thing as zero!

    John Henry Morel
    The Death of Numbers

  • The third lesson of mechanics of opposites: Zero equals one!

    John Henry Morel
    The Death of Numbers

  • With these three principles, all theories of knowledge can be solved!

    John Henry Morel
    The Death of Numbers

Test These Hypotheses:

  • It is often said that one cow is one cow too many!

    John Henry Morel
    The Death of Numbers

  • There is only one way to solve a problem!

    John Henry Morel
    The Death of Numbers

  • The sum of a man can be found below his belt!

    John Henry Morel
    The Death of Numbers

  • Very often we are led, not so often leading!

    John Henry Morel
    The Death of Numbers

  • There are two numbers, one of which is one.

    John Henry Morel
    The Death of Numbers

  • The cow said this, "How often do I have to come here?" The duck replied, "How often." The answer to this riddle is that all things equal zero in one capacity or another, whether you are here or there is irrelevant given that the solution is always equal to zero or naught.

    John Henry Morel
    The Death of Numbers

  • The last riddle is this: How many chickens does it take to lay the golden egg? The answer is as follows: Follow the yellow brick egg to naught and all will be made clear to you: Naught = What? Tell your local physicist this theory and let him work it out for you. All things being the same, naught is equal to zero, where naught is any capacity or vacuum. Positive Theory is the absence of zero in an equation limiting itself to what? Ø = What? Tell this theory to your local physicist and let him work it out for you. All things equal naught: Ø = What?

    John Henry Morel
    The Death of Numbers

Altruisms

Websites

Books

Enlightenment:

    The best way to achieve enlightenment is as follows:
    Follow me, reach enlightenment, make your penance, do your sichort everyday, do your TM everyday at least once, ask for permission from a Supreme Council Member, take notes constantly, leave a notebook by your bedside, listen to what you are being told even if it sounds ridiculous, except for jumping off a cliff or a bridge. That would not be smart and certainly would not lead you to enlightenment. But on a lighter note, ask for forgiveness and seek to remedy your actions in this life and your previous lifetimes and take notes along the way. Seek the protection of a Backtant at all times, even though you don't know what that may be. If you don't know, read my books. Always ask permission before you go to strenuous efforts like yoga or pilates to try and achieve samadhi. Nothing will work, much less that, if you haven't first made contact with a Backtant or Supreme Council Magistrate first. All is useless without a helping hand, because any simulation of enlightenment or achievement of mind is always achieved by permission and permission alone. Any other effort is simply moving particles around.

    The science of life is not what it used to be. At one time evolution was natural as a flower or mountain spring. That has changed and now you only need to ask permission. Even with the Ascended Masters when they were around, it was always permission, though they never told you. Asking permission is like recognizing that you are human and there is something waiting for you on the other side. It is impossible to cross over to the other side from your side of the mountain: You must always request someone to walk you over the mountain. It just doesn't seem that way. You think that everything that you do gets you closer to enlightenment. Nothing is further from the truth: Without realizing that you are not your own Maker and not your own destiny, you are going around in circles making mud-pies. And making mud-pies is about as accurate as I can be! Realize that paying attention is half the work and the other half is in asking for permission from those in charge. That's basically it. If you do your sichort and your TM and take notes fastidiously, the only thing left is to ask for permission to finish up your embodiment quickly and efficaciously before you go home.

    John Henry Morel
    The Death of Numbers

    Add to Technorati Favorites
Close